Tag: Founding Fathers

  • Once a slaveholder…

    Once a slaveholder…

    If you’ve followed Knowledge Keepers for any amount of time, you know that we started after a simple google search for historic photos of American inventors. That led down a rabbit trail of learning how biased an internet search can be, and realizing just how atrocious the “history” online is.

    Now, I know that history content on the web is sketchy, but it’s gotten worse each year. Take my search for a photo of Robert Carter III.

    Labeled for Life

    Who’s Robert Carter III? He’s the wealthy Virginia plantation owner in Virginia Tutor: Journal and Letters of Philip Vickers Fithian, our latest (to date) Knowledge Keepers title. As I do with all of my history reprints, I seek out up-to-date information on the people and places in the books. I like to add maps, photos, or even info that wasn’t readily available when these old books were first published.

    So, I wanted to find a portrait of Robert Carter III, his wife, and maybe their plantation, Nominy Hall. As I suspected, Wikipedia has a page on each of them. But in my search, here’s how it showed up in the results:

    Notice the title given to Ann? “American Slaveowner.”

    Yes, she and her husband did own slaves. About 500, in fact. But you’d guess by this simple web search that owning slaves was all they were known for.

    However, there’s something very interesting that you’d only know if you kept digging for info on the Carters.

    Oops, there’s that label again. Sigh.

    At least CNN reported on him more fairly:

    “It was 230 years ago Sunday that Robert Carter III, the patriarch of one of the wealthiest families in Virginia, quietly walked into a Northumberland County courthouse and delivered an airtight legal document announcing his intention to free, or manumit, more than 500 slaves.

    He titled it the “deed of gift.” It was, by far, experts say, the largest liberation of Black people before President Abraham Lincoln signed the District of Columbia Emancipation Act and Emancipation Proclamation more than seven decades later.“

    It is disingenuous to label Robert and Ann with the title “American Slaveowner” when there is a lot more to their history. This is the modern way of marking someone for their wrongs, while ignoring anything they did of worth.

    He is quoted as having a religious conversion that prompted him to begin the process of manumission. It took several years, but he set the process in motion to free 452 slaves, and ended up freeing nearly 600.

    This info was not even mentioned in the original release of Philip Fithian’s journal, though the first printing was in 1900. Maybe the publisher and editor weren’t aware. Who knows? But it is certainly included in the Knowledge Keepers edition.

    Museum Bias

    But that’s not all. I want to show you how much has changed in history videos on the web.

    When I’m reading and proofing one of these old history books, I like to do a lot of research in case there are notes to add (ahem: manumission, anyone?) or terms to clarify. So I perused YouTube for some videos on 18th century life in Virginia. I want you to watch these two videos and tell me if you spot the differences. (Note the date of release for each one.)

    Virginia Museum of History and Culture: October 7, 2020

    P. Allen Smith: August 11, 2014

    Did you notice the bias? Did you notice the vast differences in information?

    The Virginia Museum of History and Culture has access to a wealth of artifacts and information. Yet in that short 8 minutes of “Life in Colonial Virginia,” they chose to predominantly focus on the enslaved population of Virginia, even when attempting to focus on the other classes.

    The P. Allen Smith video truly focuses on actual “18th Century Living,” which is what most people are expecting when they google “life in 18th century Virginia.”

    While slavery was and is an abhorrent practice, it was not the only thing that took place in American history. We want to know about all aspects of life in different time periods, and we want to know the full story.

    The examples I shared are illustrative of Critical Race Theory. Those that practice this will say it doesn’t exist. But viewing everything in history through a racial lense is exactly that.

    Virginia Tutor The journal and letters of Phillip Vickers Fithian

    You can Google what happened at a certain time period and get numerous results with varying levels of bias, or you could read books written in that same time period.

    That’s what we’re here for: The original writings of ordinary and extraordinary people. The big, the small, the good, the bad, the embarrassing, and the celebratory. Nothing is left out and nothing is revised to make modern readers feel comfy. Just snapshots in time that bring history to life.

    We strongly believe that Americans must preserve our history in printed books, in homes across the nation. Internet archives are not sufficient. They are unreliable, and easily revised on a whim. Will you join the home library movement?

    Get your copy of Virginia Tutor and read up on life in 18th century Virginia, Robert Carter III, and get all the facts.

  • Howard Zinn and the hatred of America

    Howard Zinn and the hatred of America

    For a long time, I couldn’t understand why people hated our historical forefathers. I didn’t know where the Pilgrim and Columbus misunderstanding and misrepresentation came from. I mean, I assumed (correctly) that it was being badly taught in schools, but I thought it was a gradual updating of one textbook from the last (bad) textbook, written by liberal bureaucrats and taught by teachers who hadn’t done their research.

    While much of that is also true, I began to realize that there was a definite shift in the representation of all American history in my lifetime. That shift was the result of one book: A People’s History of the United States of America by Howard Zinn. There are two ways you can verify this: ask anyone what they believe about Columbus, or ask them if they’ve ever heard of Howard Zinn. You’ll find that either answer is connected to both questions. Most Americans today believe Columbus was a murdering rapist, and they have no clue who Zinn is. An additional segment of the population knows who Zinn is and adores him (while celebrating Indigenous People’s Day).

    I strongly urge all Americans to read Zinn’s book along with Debunking Howard Zinn by Mary Grabar. Reading Zinn’s book will help you to understand how we got where we are today. Reading Grabar’s book will expose the ridiculousness of Zinn’s “history.”

    Zinn uses a mix of plagiarism and opinion to create what is a very influential mangling of American history. And Americans have lapped it up. No double checking. No critical thinking.

    Zinn prided himself on telling “untold” stories. The reason they were “untold” is because they were untrue.

    Don’t just take it from me. Here at Knowledge Keepers, I specialize in publishing the stories that were written by the people who were there. Just like Columbus. He was not a murdering rapist. He was not a saint. He was human, just like you and me, and he while he made some errors in judgement, he also accomplished some incredible things.

    The same is true throughout American history. Zinn paints pretty much all American heroes as devils. But that’s not all. He has a knack for sanctifying the underdog, as if being a victim automatically imbues righteousness. (Now we call it intersectionality, a cog in the Critical Theory machine.)

    There’s no doubt that Zinn reshuffled the good guys and the bad guys. As we shall see, A People’s History recast World War II — the “good war” fought by the “Greatest Generation” — as a string of Allied atrocities matching those of our Nazi enemies. Zinn inspired young activists to embrace Marxism and see civil rights through its lens rather than as a fight for equal opportunity, as it was originally envisioned by the abolitionists, the NAACP, and even the early black nationalists…

    What he did in his History, as Zinn explained on page two of his autobiography, was to reveal the Founding Fathers to be not only “ingenious organizers” but also “rich white slaveholders, merchants, bondholders, fearful of lower-class rebellion, or, as James Madison put it, of an ‘equal division of property.’ Our military heroes — Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt — were racists, Indian-killers, war lovers, imperialists. Our most liberal Presidents — Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, Kennedy — were more concerned with political power and national aggrandizement than with the rights of nonwhite people. (Grabar, Chapter 2: The Life of Zinn)

    Mary Grabar, in Debunking Howard Zinn, painstakingly corrects Zinn’s history with primary source documents. She also shares Zinn’s personal and professional history, including the fact that he was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA. He taught classes on Marxism, marched for communist ideals, and campaigned for Marxist politicians. He was a proud Marxist, and it is reflected in his writings.

    Grabar goes on to note (with the backing of multiple historians) that “Howard Zinn has succeeded in convincing a generation of Americans that the nation Abraham Lincoln called the “last best hope of Earth” is essentially a racist criminal enterprise built on murdering Indians, exploiting slaves, and oppressing the working man.“

    This is the reason that teachers, professors, and college grads hate America. This is is why school students and pastors and many other average American citizens truly believe that our American ancestors were just a bunch of racist, greedy Europeans and that Christopher Columbus actually tortured and raped the Indian people he encountered on his voyages. The Zinn narrative has become part of the fabric of America.

    Now you see these ideas in every medium: children’s books, textbooks, history lessons, educational YouTube videos, Hollywood, and social media. That’s why many well-meaning Americans simply believe the lies. They’re hard to escape.

    Zinn is not entirely to blame for the rise in Marxist critical theory (or cultural Marxism), but he took the academic notions and made them mainstream. If you’re unfamiliar with these ideas, I encourage you to read The Politically Incorrect Guide to Communism, with a special focus on the last chapters on Cultural Marxism. Social justice, feminism, intersectionality…the list is growing longer. All of these stem from Marxism.

    My focus here at Knowledge Keepers is history in print, original sources, and not quick Google searches. While a Google search will show you what the currant narrative is about Christopher Columbus, the Pilgrims, and the Founders, printed copies of primary sources are the safest form of knowledge, as well as the preservation of that knowledge.

    Read Christopher Columbus’ actual diaries (including the diary of Las Casas) in Christopher Columbus: His Story and His Journals. Read Zinn’s history for yourself, and read Mary Grabar’s book along with it. And consider investing in the Knowledge Keepers set to preserve primary sources in your own home and for your children and grandchildren.

    It’s no longer enough to read history; you must be aware of the differences between primary sources and modern revisions. Teach your children the differences. Show them the truth and the lies. If you plan to send your children to any college anywhere, prepare them with these books first. Help them to recognize bias.

    Be a Knowledge Keeper!

  • Slavery and the Founding Fathers

    Slavery and the Founding Fathers

    Why didn’t our founding fathers set their slaves free if they were so interested in freedom? What does that have to do with Pride and Prejudice or Downton Abbey? Why should you read my recent history book, Able and Mighty Men? Let’s address the issue of slavery and the founding fathers with a bit of actual history, shall we?

    Today’s narrative about our founders is that they were all slaveholding white supremacists. On the surface, you might be inclined to agree with them. I mean, if they believed “all men are created equal,” shouldn’t that apply to slaves, too?They certainly did believe it, but they were also still held to an old British system of law called entail (or fee tail), which had its roots in an even older system called primogeniture.

    Primogeniture only allowed a noble title (King, earl, etc.) to pass down through families through the oldest male heir. And entail is essentially the land and property form of primogentiure.

    In Pride and Prejudice, remember the annoying cousin Mr. Collins, who was the heir to Mr. Bennet’s estate? Remember cousin Matthew in Downton Abbey, who was the heir to the Earl of Grantham’s estate? They did not own their titles or estates outright, so they could not decide who would inherit them next. The estates were entailed by law. Daughters could not inherit, so estates passed to the closest male heir.

    Entail in the Colonies

    This is the same law that the American colonists were under. Washington, Jefferson, and all the landowners in the colonies were British subjects, and as such, their estates were also entailed. They could not simply “set their slaves free” or will them away.

    Until…

    “The first bill he [Thomas Jefferson] introduced was aimed at the slave trade, and prohibited the farther importation of negroes into Virginia. This act alone is a triumphant confutation of the accusation often reiterated against Mr. Jefferson, that he was an advocate of slavery. To its principles he was always opposed, and SUBMITTED TO IT PRACTICALLY ONLY BY ENTAIL. That he struck the first blow at the unhallowed trade of importing human beings for the purpose of consigning them to bondage, is a fact beyond dispute. That this was the first grand step towards a correction of the most cruel features of the traffic, will not be denied.” (Able and Mighty Men: Biographies of the Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence)

    Slavery and the founding fathers

    Very soon after the Declaration of Independence was signed, Jefferson introduced a bill to abolish the entail in Virginia. He set the standard for the other colonies to follow, and soon this outdated system went the way of monarchy in America. But just as independence wasn’t automatic (it took 7 years of war and countless lives to win), entails and slavery didn’t end overnight. Many of our founders argued tirelessly for the abolition of slavery, but they were arguing for many, many things during this time. To be fair, fighting a revolution and starting a new system of government from scratch are lofty endeavors, and every battle couldn’t be won at the same time.

    History shows us, if we will just look, that they set the wheels in motion with the war for independence, as well as the abolition of the entail and many other British laws and customs. You won’t read this in a school textbook, or learn it at a university (unless you study law), or see it in a museum. You’ll only find this kind of information in the old books that were written by people who understood the times because they lived in them, and by people who knew our founders and wrote what they saw and heard.

    Able and Mighty Men

    This is why I published Able and Mighty Men, and this is why I’m so passionate about preserving accurate history in printed books. The internet is ever-changing. But printed books, journals, eyewitness accounts, firsthand reports, letters, speeches — these are the link to our real history. This is how you know that our founders weren’t evil racists.

    There’s always more to the story.

    “The Founding Fathers Were White Supremacists”

    You have probably read or heard by now that “all whites are racists.” Similarly, you may have read that all the founding fathers were racist or white supremacists. But the “all” in these phrases is simply unfair. Humans are individuals and cannot, in any circumstance, be categorized so easily. Some of our founders did own slaves, but not all. Some of them did view their black slaves as inferior humans, but not all. Some slaveowners were cruel masters, but not all. I could go on. History is the long story of individuals making decisions for good or bad, right or wrong, and the results of those decisions. Some decisions are huge, and affect generations of people (or millenia, as in the case of slavery).

    A true student of history will refrain from:

    • Lumping “all” into one category based on a few
    • Quoting only from modern sources on historic events
    • Presuming to understand the thoughts and actions of historic persons without any written proof

    Instead, we should read all we can from original sources, and even then, not make assumptions. Let’s learn from our ancestors, and vow not to repeat their wrongs.

    Able and Mighty Men

    Get your copy of Able and Mighty Men: Biographies of the Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence here at Knowledge Keepers Bookstore, or on Amazon with free Prime shipping.

    And if you homeschool, get my free download of the History of the Declaration of Independence study as a supplement to this book!

    RELATED POST: Read Nicki Truesdell’s post on The 1619 Project here.

    Able and Mighty Men Book and Study Guide